I've watched both. Pulp Fiction's directing well, but the film is overrated due to dialogues.
On the other hand, Fargo... It is not cut-n-cut film. It is funnier. It has best ever plot. Its all characters (specially the two evil) are pretty nice. It is made with a style, while, pulp fiction is made with an idea. Two differ that Fargo is mature, Pulp Fiction is not so...
It is like this: You have two scenarios, one is well defined, the other is Not so.. And you know? Dialogues in Pulp Fiction or Quotes as people call it are made from those types of dialogues that have a suppose, it supposes it is good, but that's not enough for a film who wants to make a best picture. A Best Picture can be a culture, so deep in effect on culture of people and impressive. Plz don't say there are no such films, go watch these films: Raising Arizona, Phone Booth, Rango, And Fargo....... It is a real comedy...
Fargo has many stories in itself, too, but that does not make itself randomly so well.......
Thanks!
On the other hand, Fargo... It is not cut-n-cut film. It is funnier. It has best ever plot. Its all characters (specially the two evil) are pretty nice. It is made with a style, while, pulp fiction is made with an idea. Two differ that Fargo is mature, Pulp Fiction is not so...
It is like this: You have two scenarios, one is well defined, the other is Not so.. And you know? Dialogues in Pulp Fiction or Quotes as people call it are made from those types of dialogues that have a suppose, it supposes it is good, but that's not enough for a film who wants to make a best picture. A Best Picture can be a culture, so deep in effect on culture of people and impressive. Plz don't say there are no such films, go watch these films: Raising Arizona, Phone Booth, Rango, And Fargo....... It is a real comedy...
Fargo has many stories in itself, too, but that does not make itself randomly so well.......
Thanks!