The specs are pretty stunning:
At B&H
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1044728-REG/sony_ilce7s_b_alpha_a7s_mirrorless_digital.html
Review
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/sony-a7s/sony-a7sA.HTM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgbUgNiHfXM
A big miss by Sony though is that you need an external recorder to record in 4k. Atmos have said they will offer one with their new Shogun but the cost will be "around $2,000".
Atmos Shogun
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/video/news/unveiled-atomos-shogun-4k-hdmi-monitorrecorder
Yet you can buy a Blackmagic Design Production Camera 4K for $3k which can record 4k directly to an SSD - no $2k external recorder required.
The BMPC4k also offers RAW which the Sony does not.
The Sony though has a full frame sensor, not so the BMPC4k. Low light filming is important to me so the Sony has a big advantage there.
I'm not a codec expert at all, and don't fully understand this on the Sony's spec sheet:
Can anyone tell me how the above codecs compare to Apple ProRes or RAW?
My present camera is a Canon 6D. I like it but its output format (H.264) gives little flexibility in post.
- 12.2MP Full-Frame Exmor CMOS Sensor
- BIONZ X Image Processor
- Gapless On-Chip Lens Design
- Full HD Recording in XAVC S
- 4:2:2 UHD 4K Output via HDMI
- Full Pixel Read-Out, S-Log2 Gamma
- Expandable Sensitivity: ISO 50-409600
- Fast Intelligent 25-Point AF System
- 3.0" 921.6k-Dot Tilting LCD Monitor
- XGA 2.36M-Dot OLED Electronic Viewfinder
At B&H
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1044728-REG/sony_ilce7s_b_alpha_a7s_mirrorless_digital.html
Review
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/sony-a7s/sony-a7sA.HTM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgbUgNiHfXM
A big miss by Sony though is that you need an external recorder to record in 4k. Atmos have said they will offer one with their new Shogun but the cost will be "around $2,000".
Atmos Shogun
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/video/news/unveiled-atomos-shogun-4k-hdmi-monitorrecorder
Yet you can buy a Blackmagic Design Production Camera 4K for $3k which can record 4k directly to an SSD - no $2k external recorder required.
The BMPC4k also offers RAW which the Sony does not.
The Sony though has a full frame sensor, not so the BMPC4k. Low light filming is important to me so the Sony has a big advantage there.
I'm not a codec expert at all, and don't fully understand this on the Sony's spec sheet:
It is able to output uncompressed 4:2:2 UHD 4K video to an optional external recorder over HDMI, as well as record full HD 1080p video in the high-quality XAVC S format at 50 Mbps in multiple frame rates. Extending the video recording capabilities is support for S-Log2 gamma, which helps to expand the effective dynamic range during recording, as well as picture profile options, time code, and zebra marker display aids
Can anyone tell me how the above codecs compare to Apple ProRes or RAW?
My present camera is a Canon 6D. I like it but its output format (H.264) gives little flexibility in post.
Last edited: