**Read before answering***
I have seen many movies with miscues with the dialogue, but what kept me intrigued was the way in which it was acted and shot. Many of Kubrick films (At least in my opinion) had a flat script, but what kept me intrigued was the way in which his films were shot and acted since the camera alone, can present its own story in and of itself. So the camera can tell more about the story than what is being said in the script which makes movies different from books.
I've also heard that most people don't even pay attention to what is being said, our minds pay attention to how it is being said. Audiences seem to be manipulated by the power of the speaker rather than his speech, but again this is just my opinion.
So do you think a flat script, if presented with great acting, fantastic cinematography that supports the story, would create a real/believable atmosphere for the viewer?
What are your opinions?
I have seen many movies with miscues with the dialogue, but what kept me intrigued was the way in which it was acted and shot. Many of Kubrick films (At least in my opinion) had a flat script, but what kept me intrigued was the way in which his films were shot and acted since the camera alone, can present its own story in and of itself. So the camera can tell more about the story than what is being said in the script which makes movies different from books.
I've also heard that most people don't even pay attention to what is being said, our minds pay attention to how it is being said. Audiences seem to be manipulated by the power of the speaker rather than his speech, but again this is just my opinion.
So do you think a flat script, if presented with great acting, fantastic cinematography that supports the story, would create a real/believable atmosphere for the viewer?
What are your opinions?
Last edited: