The ending shot is better than the previous ones, but the people still float over the background because it doesn't start moving with them until halfway into the shot.
The new backgrounds you've chosen don't really match - the rocky, snowy mountain shot with heavy, dark cloud cover doesn't make any sense with what looks like spring or summertime in the meadow. The colors don't match either - compare the green between the two and there's a much stronger red component in the grass in the mountain shot vs. the meadow. They also both look like low-res photos blown up to fill the screen, especially the first mountain shot and the final shot behind the people.
The perspective looks wrong again on the wide mountain shot - it now looks more like a fairly small ship very close to the camera. It should probably be smaller, and in the distance, and have a light shadow on the ground to help sell the scale and perspective. A shadow below the ship as it rises from the meadow would also tie the ship into the background better, although I still feel like it doesn't really even need to be in the shot.
After watching it a few times I'm also starting to wonder what's supposed to be going on in the first shot? Why does the ship just hover there for so long, and why does it blur in and out? I'd be inclined to just go from the ship hovering in the first shot, show a small flash/beam shoot down out of the shot, cut to the meadow with the beam hitting the ground, and have the people appear, getting rid of the middle shot entirely.
[EDIT] TheMurph beat me to it - I think we're basically describing the same sequence. Might be worth considering that two different people, unfamiliar with the material, came to the same conclusion about how it would work better.