Dreadylocks Nov 24, 2010 #2 As usual, that was a fun read. But I can't say I agree with the sentiment. And a couple of analogies in there were kind of reaching, imho.
As usual, that was a fun read. But I can't say I agree with the sentiment. And a couple of analogies in there were kind of reaching, imho.
Adeimantus Nov 24, 2010 #3 Ummmmm... Didn't we just go through this previously? Not that the discussion we had was particularly high-brow, although I must admit I was amused by the scatological nature of the debate.
Ummmmm... Didn't we just go through this previously? Not that the discussion we had was particularly high-brow, although I must admit I was amused by the scatological nature of the debate.
Ernest Worthing Nov 24, 2010 #5 We did go through it. Not that i commented on that thread bc i felt it was just a question for questions sake. Besides there is a reason why a directors name appears at the end of the beginning credits and at the beginning of the end credits.
We did go through it. Not that i commented on that thread bc i felt it was just a question for questions sake. Besides there is a reason why a directors name appears at the end of the beginning credits and at the beginning of the end credits.
laughingcrow Nov 25, 2010 #9 Who was the author of your article? You or all the others you cited? BTW, your site took five minutes to load.
Who was the author of your article? You or all the others you cited? BTW, your site took five minutes to load.