This is going to be difficult for me to say, without sounding like an A-hole. Please know that I'm not trying to chop you down or discourage any future work.
In my opinion, a movie has to acheive a certain aesthetic to be taken seriously by most audiences. The cinematography needs to be professional-quality; the acting, audio, everything needs to be professional quality. Without acheiving that, I believe most audiences just won't take a movie seriously. They might watch it, but they watch it knowing that they are watching something ameatureish and I think they kind of giggle inside at the comparatively poor production values. It is for this reason that I believe a low-budget production will be most effective if it keeps things light and fun.
Speaking of your movie in particular, you might think my idea of giving it a "Laser Cats" treatment is crap, but actually I mentioned that because you kind of already have done that. "I, Creator" does not have the aesthetic of "Terminator". It has the aesthetic of "Laser Cats". I'm not just talking about cinematography, but props, costumes, locations, everything. Instead of letting that be a detractor, you could use it as a strength, have some fun with it, ramp up the tongue-in-cheek humor to level 10.
For "I, Creator 2", you're talking about having it take place in a spaceship and then on a distant planet populated by Amazon women. You can't really think that any audience is going to take that seriously, do you? I'm not saying don't make it. I'd love to see it. But me, personally, I only want to watch it if you make it fun, take advantage of the inherent humor that already exists in a low-budget futuristic sci-fi.
I see no reason why you can't tell the same story, with the same interesting characters that you've created, while making us laugh at the fun of it all.
The reason we are looking to up the budget is to give it better production values where it will be taken seriously. A good movie about a planet of high tech Amazons is an untapped market.
The producers of Smallville had a steep road to climb to make a better Supergirl in Season 7 when the Supergirl movie with Helen Slater was done really bad and campy.
I still expect the sequel to be campy, but it will turn peoples heads when they see how much better is can be than the first.
Most Indie movies are of the B-movie caliber to begin with. What makes them interesting are unique characters and an original story. In making a science fiction movie, some basics must remain in tack like making a story with social values like THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL.
These days, Hollywood forgets about this as the red meat and turns out "eye candy" movies that are all action and special effects with no story.
I, Creator is its' own production with it's own look. As the filmmaker who did the animated titles for me said, it has a comic book style to it. That's okay with me. The Wonder Woman TV series looked campy and like a comic book and became popular.
There is a difference in the look of Terminator Salvation and Terminator: TSCC too. That's because of budget.
By the way, the working title for I, Creator 2 is I, Creator 2: Herstory. It should have some of the look and feel of a Star Trek movie made for TV and a Greek mythology movie. Action movies and Science Fiction have a greater global appeal than a comedy because viewers don't have to understand the language like a comedy to enjoy the visuals and the action.
The real fans of Indie movies will take them seriously. You just need to get a better idea of what's out there like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Mhecb6fMg
Besides, making the original I, Creator put me into contact with better DPs. I have one lined up, if we can get the sequel off the ground.
Last edited: