I know it cost a lot more what with finishing costs and such but the initial production cost the filmmakers $30,000!
How is that possible? From what I gather they had 2 cameras and actors working for free. Can anyone enlighten me on how it would cost so much? I find it very concerning.
The answers to any question about budget can always be found in simple arithmetic.
The filmmakers were from Florida, and the DP was from LA (a nice guy who used to post on INDIECLUB). The actors from LA and elsewhere and they shot in New England. Airfare, hotel, and food for a few weeks can add up. Production insurance is 10% of your costs (so subtract $3,000 off the top). My understanding was that the actors were paid a stipend each day, some nominal amount and were later paid in the million dollar range when the movie was successful in theaters.
1 hotel room @ $50 for 10 days = $500 x 10 people = $5,000
meals 3 x a day x 10 days @ $10 per meal x 10 people = $3,000
Airfare 10 people x an average of $400 per ticket = $4,000 (+/- $300 per person)
Rental cars, film stock, processing, telecine, and since this is 1998, not everyone had an editing computer in their house capable of editing a feature length film, so studio time for post production, and it's a miracle they pulled this off for $30,000 in up front costs. These guys paid themselves something, even if only a little bit per day, as well as their crew, which was more than just the actors so don't believe the hype and bullshiite marketing - there is a Director of Photography on that film that wasn't one of the actors, as well as a small crew.
In the revised budgets, the cost of music rights alone was way over $100,000, plus errors and omissions insurance. There is more than just a 35mm film print involved when making the prints for theaters. The sound remix was extensive from what was original used as production audio.