In my script, it's about a man who seeks revenge in the third act, and at the end of the second act, going into the start of the third, he rounds up a pretty much a posse of people and they form a lynch mob to go after the villain, with murderous intentions. They believe that the villain should not go on killing, wreaking havoc and continuing to get away with it. The MC is able to round them up after the villain has done enough damage to everyone.
One writer who reviewed the script told me that they didn't like the other lynch mob characters because they have no prior development before they form a lynch mob, and as a result the characters feel like nothing more than plot devices.
I suppose it's kind of like the movie Lady Vengeance, where you follow a lone protagonist for most of it, but then she rounds up a team in the third act.
However, is this a problem? Does it matter if these characters are plot devices since they are not as major of characters? Does every other characters besides the major players need depth and a backstory with development? I mean it's obvious that the main characters are given depth, backstory and character development, but what about more minor characters? I mean in a movie like Goldfinger for example, Oddjob, is a plot device character. No depth really, he is just there to help the villain, cause the writers didn't want the villain doing everything himself. Or in Magnum Force, you have a group of vigilante cops, but they are not really given any backstory to explain how they were before much, they were just there to a serve a purpose in the plot, and that's all. Or in a better example, in the movie M, the mob wants to kill a serial killer, and they get a lot of homeless people to help and act as informers, but the homeless people are not given any backstory before they are recruited. So in that sense, do the characters who help a main character, have to be more than plot devices?
Because if I give these characters backstories and development and all that, then perhaps that could be a problem too and people will think that I have spent too much time on minor characters. What do you think?
Thanks for the advice and input. I appreciate it.
One writer who reviewed the script told me that they didn't like the other lynch mob characters because they have no prior development before they form a lynch mob, and as a result the characters feel like nothing more than plot devices.
I suppose it's kind of like the movie Lady Vengeance, where you follow a lone protagonist for most of it, but then she rounds up a team in the third act.
However, is this a problem? Does it matter if these characters are plot devices since they are not as major of characters? Does every other characters besides the major players need depth and a backstory with development? I mean it's obvious that the main characters are given depth, backstory and character development, but what about more minor characters? I mean in a movie like Goldfinger for example, Oddjob, is a plot device character. No depth really, he is just there to help the villain, cause the writers didn't want the villain doing everything himself. Or in Magnum Force, you have a group of vigilante cops, but they are not really given any backstory to explain how they were before much, they were just there to a serve a purpose in the plot, and that's all. Or in a better example, in the movie M, the mob wants to kill a serial killer, and they get a lot of homeless people to help and act as informers, but the homeless people are not given any backstory before they are recruited. So in that sense, do the characters who help a main character, have to be more than plot devices?
Because if I give these characters backstories and development and all that, then perhaps that could be a problem too and people will think that I have spent too much time on minor characters. What do you think?
Thanks for the advice and input. I appreciate it.
Last edited: