Home Your Ad Here

Go Back   IndieTalk - Indie Film Forum > Making The Film > Cinematography/Lighting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2017, 05:30 AM   #1
jjdog
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: NY
Posts: 14
I read something on the internet about UV filtering

"All digital camera sensors have a UV/IR filter in front of the sensor, so there is no more need to use UV filters on DSLRs."

Source: https://photographylife.com/lens-filters-explained/

True or false? I don't see anything in the description or manual for the Lumix G85 about built-in UV/IR filtering.

I ask because I'll be filming at a beach and figured it can't hurt to use a filter, at least for protection. The vast selection even in a particular size and subcategory like "UV" or "clear" is dizzying.
jjdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today   #1A
film guy
Basic Member
 
Posts: 17

 
Old 03-21-2017, 06:58 PM   #2
indietalk
IndieTalk Founder
 
indietalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,078
It's true modern cameras have inherent UV protection, but it will not physically protect the lens so many people still use them to protect from scratches, smudges, etc. Up to you!
indietalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2017, 09:56 PM   #3
jax_rox
IndieTalk Moderator
 
jax_rox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,825
Sensors do all have IR cut filters, which is why you can turn your standard DSLR into an IR sensitive camera if you really have the want and the know-how (or money to pay someone to do it).

That said, you may need to use further IR cut filters if you're using heavy ND that isn't designed to cut it additionally.

UV is different to IR, but as digital sensors aren't particularly sensitive to UV, there's no need to filter it.
There may be some particular instances where a UV filter may help, but for the most part, they're unnecessary as far as the image goes.

As for protection - a lens filter is never going to protect a lens! These filters certainly can be used to protect the lens. I've ditched them as I don't see the point of paying thousands of dollars for a lens, only to put a <$100 piece of glass on the front of it.

But if you're going somewhere where there may be extra danger of damage to the front element, then sure - why not?

UV is a specific filter that filters UV light. Clear is essentially a piece of glass.
jax_rox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


©IndieTalk