Home

Go Back   IndieTalk - Indie Film Forum > Making The Film > Directing
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2011, 04:06 AM   #1
MrDirector
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: RI
Posts: 41
When the talent isn't performing it like you need it, how early do you say "Cut." ??

Looking for opinions from everyone here.

Let's say you know exactly how you want a particular scene to play out. But the actor doesn't perform in the scene, the way you want and you know that the take wasn't usable. Do you say cut right away? Or let them play it out for a few more moments?

I remember a few times I knew the take wasn't usable and I said "cut" right away. These were on takes where the actor / actress had to move to a certain space in the shot or deliver a line a certain way. It didn't seem like a big thing at the time, just something out of necessity.

Anyway, I noticed they would look angry or annoyed if I had to stop them in the middle of their performance too often. I can understand and see it from their position. "I'm to give my best performance for this scene.... while NOT being distracted with whether or not he's going to sharply say 'Cut?'"



Do you tend to let the take ride out a bit? For a few extra moments before saying cut? Or do you like to say cut as soon as you realize the take is not usable?


It may be something minor, but it's something I wouldn't mind improving on. I don't want to hold them back from giving their best.
MrDirector is offline   Reply With Quote




Old 11-30-2011, 05:05 AM   #2
Cracker Funk
Premiere Member
 
Cracker Funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8,583
Blog Entries: 3
As a general rule, if it's their performance that needs correcting, I'd let them continue. That's not to say there aren't times when I'll cut early in a shot, but when I do, it's normally a case of me not clearly communicating what I wanted. So, my reason for calling "cut" wasn't that they were messing up, but that I had messed up.

P.S. Please don't take this as expert advice, I'm still learning, just like you. Just sharing my experiences.
__________________
GUERILLA!!!
Cracker Funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 05:55 AM   #3
brianluce
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 1,558
If they're really throwing themselves in the moment, I'd let them continue. Then when the finish say, "That was excellent, but try again with a little more xyz" or whatever. Personally I'm wary of cutting someone off if they're truly pushing themselves -- to the point I probably go too far and have hand an actor say "Are you ever going to call cut?" But I like erring on that side.
brianluce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 09:29 AM   #4
Uranium City
IndieTalk Moderator
 
Uranium City's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 2,003
I make it a point to have a great relationship with my actors beforehand so that when they aren't giving me what we need, I can say cut and not waste any time.

But often I'll wait it out, looking for something interesting...anything...maybe even a certain look that would be a great cutaway.

Depends on the scene, the take, the actor...the moment.
Uranium City is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 10:07 AM   #5
Gonzo_Entertainment
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
Gonzo_Entertainment's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,391
I usually let it play out, you might get some other moment that IS usable in that take.
Gonzo_Entertainment is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 10:20 AM   #6
directorik
IndieTalk Filmmaking Guru
 
directorik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: hollywood
Posts: 7,488
When I started I was shooting film. I could not afford to let
the actor play it out so I got into the habit of stopping them
the moment I was unhappy. I also learned to rely on coverage.
So sometimes I would let them play it out and then cover
what I didn't like in different angles.

Old habits are hard to break and since that old habit works
for me I still do it. Even today I have time to consider. I usually
am on a strict schedule so I don't have the option of letting
entire scenes play out if the actors are not giving me what I
need. So I stop, talk to them about the problem I'm having
and start again.
directorik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 11:07 AM   #7
Alcove Audio
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
Alcove Audio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 6,510
Blog Entries: 4
Just to expand on directorik, I know that it costs time, but it doesn't cost you any media (film, or in my case, audio tape) any more. With digital we can comp together good performances. The beginning of the performance may be poor, but you may get something great at the end of it.
Alcove Audio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 11:43 AM   #8
wheatgrinder
Premiere Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,113
How about letting the camera roll, but resetting.. or just asking them to change it DURING the take. I think this is more gentle.. right.. you can just lean into the shot, and give the direction you need and pick it up from where ever..
__________________
You may think me a little mad, but you'd be wrong, there is nothing little about my madness.
wheatgrinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 11:17 PM   #9
rockerrockstar
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
rockerrockstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,068
I have heard that sometimes the takes that you think will not work will be the ones that do work. I am no expert but that is what I have heard. I would be worried that if you say cut you could miss something in the take. Also, if you say cut too much the actors may get rattled.
rockerrockstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 10:53 AM   #10
jmoschner
Basic Member
 
jmoschner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 179
Hopefully you will have worked out most of the acting during rehearsals and table reads. On set we usually do a practice take before we roll (or sometimes even roll on it just for reference or potential bloopery goodness) which allows for making adjustments with the actors before shooting.

Once we are rolling it is all situational as to when we would yell cut. If it is something that would ruin the entire take, cut right away. If it is something that only hurts part of take it is often better to let it go and make an adjustment before the next take.

At least that is what seems to work for us.
jmoschner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 11:17 AM   #11
M1chae1
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
M1chae1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,322
Generally, you'd let them finish...unless you're shooting on film and have a limited budget. Or the location is about to kick you out...

You could also cut them early and blame it on the technical stuff...for instance, 'Cut! Sorry about that, we're going to go again for camera.'

Of course you can't really do this that often if the camera man is sensitive. Nor if the camera is locked completely down with no focus pulling needed.

If you're not getting what you want over and over...pull the actor aside in private...and do what you do--direct them.

Cheers!

Last edited by M1chae1; 12-02-2011 at 11:20 AM.
M1chae1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 12:40 PM   #12
_Rok_
Basic Member
 
_Rok_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 391
I'll come at this as an actor:

If the actor makes choices you don't like, let him go until the end of the take. If you cut them off too often, they'll either lose confidence and/or become quite annoyed. As a result, they'll pull back on their commitment to the performance, and start aping the performance they think you want.

If there's a technical reason that a take is blown it's perfectly acceptable to cut early.
_Rok_ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2011, 09:47 PM   #13
GuerrillaAngel
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
GuerrillaAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,834
I'd go with one complete take before you start saying cut. Performances might go downhill from there (or someother unforeseen event -- lost of location, tech issue) and you'll kick yourself for not having an entire take you could possibly fix in post.

Good luck.
GuerrillaAngel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2011, 04:38 PM   #14
Modern Day Myth Prod. LLC
Premiere Member
 
Modern Day Myth Prod. LLC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rego Park, NY
Posts: 3,829
Blog Entries: 6
I'm guilty of letting it play out too long before calling "cut." I still have to ingrain it into myself we can only shoot within the hours of a permit and some actors cannot make it back from another country for a reshoot. So, the sooner "cut" is called, the better. There are cuts and takes I'm not happy with. But, as long as most of it is usable, I have to say the shoot was useful and successful.
Modern Day Myth Prod. LLC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 05:42 AM   #15
cheetah78
Basic Member
 
cheetah78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 11
I tend to agree with _Rok_

Let the actor always go until the end of the take unless 1 or 2:
1) The rest of the take would be 100% unusable (usually tech reason)
2) Actor loses it (at least inexperienced actors don't always dare to stop acting themselves even if they have lost it (forgot their line, just lost in their thoughts etc)). If you see that they cannot get over it, just cut and shoot again.
cheetah78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

©2003-2013 IndieTalk