The way lighting for HDV vs DV is different, is the fact that most HDV cameras, save a few sonys (Z7, FX1000) have a bad lux rating of 3 or higher (worse), so than many DV cameras, especially ones like the sony vx2100 and pd170, which are both best with lowlight in comparison to others. This really affects wedding videography, where we often have little to no control over lighting and need cameras that can give a good picture in lowlight. Independent films on the otherhand, well, we should be controlling the lighting, and that being said, just about any prosumer 3ccd or cmos/3cmos camera should serve you great with good lighting. Want a cheap prosumer model with spectacular quality given good light, try the Sony HD 1000u, sports a bit more film like DOF as well along with the ability to touch the portion of the screen where you want focus!
I use sonys primarily cus they were the only good ones for lowlight at the time and still pretty much are, and I can obviously use same accessories between them, but other than that, any brand is going to serve you well in well-lit situations, canon, jvc, panasonic, etc, they are all excellent. Go on a 2 or 3 camera shoot with 2 or 3 different brands running same ccd/cmos sensors and run good lighting and they should be identical!
But anyways, yeah, the lower population of decent lowlight HDV cameras are the only real difference relating to lighting between DV and HDV, still use same keylight, fill, and backlight!