YouTube Revenue Sharing Rant

It's nuts! All of my videos were disabled for revenue sharing at once, all asking for proof to rights of music and one for video as well.

One video uses royalty free stock music from videocopilot.net. I provided them with the PDF license agreement file from the stock set and they said it's not good enough for commercial use. This is what it says:

8. The Contents are royalty free and may be published, broadcasted and distributed across all media types, except where noted by illegal use or selling in a collection.

That's not good enough??? They want a custom contract from them with the YouTube video's URL.

Another video uses music from Stock20.com. This one they're asking for the Song's Artist's name which is not anywhere on their site. They don't care about the artist name from the other stock music site though?

Finally, one video is COMPLETELY ORIGINAL. I had to have the composer write and sign a letter granting rights specifically to play on YouTube at the YouTube video URL (on top of a general "you have the rights to make as much money as you want off the music in your short" letter). He did, and it may or may not be good enough (their customer support isn't very clear) and now they're asking me to get a contract with the video owner to play it on YT. I AM THE OWNER! All rights an all that jazz.. I have to sign a contract with myself??

It's ridiculous. It happened all at once for every video on our channel.

One positive I can say, after I do send in proof they are really quick at writing a personal response.. of course it's denying it.
 
Last edited:
It's plainly not the medium for film. Their main concern is verifying more "Chad After Dentist" videos. I'm curious about some of these new ventures, but the track record has been suspect. Has anybody had good experiences with other revenue sites?
 
"Has anybody had good experiences with other revenue sites?"

No, that's my final answer after spending 2008-2009 on multiple revenue sharing networks and getting literally over a million views. Total cash draw (when they decided they felt like paying at all) $381. That's in return for thousands of hours of work.
 
"Has anybody had good experiences with other revenue sites?"

No, that's my final answer after spending 2008-2009 on multiple revenue sharing networks and getting literally over a million views. Total cash draw (when they decided they felt like paying at all) $381. That's in return for thousands of hours of work.

Dang, Nate. What's our plan?
 
Well, I know the answer to this, but you're not going to like it.

Become a content aggregation guy, rather than a content producer. The aggregation specialists are getting a penny for every time any video plays, whereas you only get a penny when your video plays. Guys like Debevois that runs machinima, (and ripped me off) make 10 million a year, and can't direct a film to save their life. Individual content guys make nothing. The entire system is geared against you. You could get a lucky break and make a few grand, but it's hard to live off of instant scratch off tickets, if you take my meaning.
 
Back
Top