 |
06-01-2012, 03:38 AM
|
#16
|
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,837
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonica44
|
It's a pan. With a long lens. The background appears to be "moving" faster because the background is much further away from the camera than the subject. There is nothing tricky going on there.
__________________
GUERILLA!!!
|
|
|
06-01-2012, 01:49 PM
|
#17
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,790
|
Okay thanks. How long of a lens would I need. I've been trying it with my 18-55 and trying to get it to look the same.
|
|
|
06-01-2012, 10:27 PM
|
#18
|
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,837
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonica44
Okay thanks. How long of a lens would I need. I've been trying it with my 18-55 and trying to get it to look the same.
|
I would only be guessing, but it looks much longer than 55mm. Only one of our more DP-type people could take a better guess at the range.
__________________
GUERILLA!!!
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 03:02 PM
|
#19
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,790
|
Okay thanks. Now this type of pan that they did, will a simple steadicam be a good tool?
Last edited by harmonica44; 09-05-2012 at 03:13 PM.
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 03:11 PM
|
#20
|
|
IndieTalk Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 7,673
|
A Pan would be a tripod, simply rotating around the vertical axis of the camera.
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 03:14 PM
|
#21
|
|
IndieTalk Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 7,673
|
But that particular shot looks like a shoulder mounted camera being walked to the right while the actor walks to the left (camera left). In the 70s, many shots were lensed with 200-400mm lenses to compress the background onto the actor and make it look more like a flat painting. This is somewhere in the realm of 80-150 but close enough to get a full frame close up of the actor.
|
|
|
09-05-2012, 04:44 PM
|
#22
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,790
|
Yeah I tripod pan probably wouldn't look right, and not be able to frame the actor the same way. I thought it might be on a dolly or something.
|
|
|
09-06-2012, 12:33 AM
|
#23
|
|
IndieTalk Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 7,673
|
Ignore the actor. Watch the background bounce as the camera turns. Then watch the actor bounce as he moves...both the camera man and the actor are stepping to the side in this shot.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.
©2003-2013 IndieTalk
|
|
 |