I realise this is hugely dependent on local conditions and markets, what sort of work I want to do, etc. I will seek out more local, specific advice in the future, but just to start my preliminary thinking, I wanted to get some thoughts.
I'm due to graduate at the end of the year. I don't expect an industry job immediately. I do plan to start building toward a career as an editor. This may involve interning somewhere for a bit - I'll be looking into that.
But in order to be marketable as either a freelance editor (preferable) or employable in a post-production house, is it necessary to have all-round skills?
I've consider myself a picture editor solely. I can use very basic sound editing and colour grading tools, but given how huge those areas are, I've never learnt them extensively, and am not effective at utilising them. I don't think that's where my talents lie. For my personal projects, I've outsourced those roles.
Yet, I realise that some clients are going to want an 'all-in-one' package. I see a few acquaintances who do offer sound and picture editing, as well as grading. I've never seen their work, but surely it's not feasible to do all those things proficiently? But would it be limiting myself to become too specialised? I've done a small bit of freelance type work (just for people who know what I do, and have asked - probably because they figure they can get it cheap that way) who always seem surprised that an editor doesn't usually deal with other post-production departments. Whilst in reality, I can offer a better service by specialising, is it necessary to learn these other things to a higher level? I don't want to invest money into a grading set up, and I don't even know how possible it'd be to set up a home audio monitoring studio that didn't completely bankrupt me (I'm sure as hell that other people who edit picture and sound don't have proper audio monitoring resources, so i'm not sure how that works).
Again, I know this will be specific to my local market and so on, but I'm curious as to others thoughts and experiences, both specific and more generic.
I'm due to graduate at the end of the year. I don't expect an industry job immediately. I do plan to start building toward a career as an editor. This may involve interning somewhere for a bit - I'll be looking into that.
But in order to be marketable as either a freelance editor (preferable) or employable in a post-production house, is it necessary to have all-round skills?
I've consider myself a picture editor solely. I can use very basic sound editing and colour grading tools, but given how huge those areas are, I've never learnt them extensively, and am not effective at utilising them. I don't think that's where my talents lie. For my personal projects, I've outsourced those roles.
Yet, I realise that some clients are going to want an 'all-in-one' package. I see a few acquaintances who do offer sound and picture editing, as well as grading. I've never seen their work, but surely it's not feasible to do all those things proficiently? But would it be limiting myself to become too specialised? I've done a small bit of freelance type work (just for people who know what I do, and have asked - probably because they figure they can get it cheap that way) who always seem surprised that an editor doesn't usually deal with other post-production departments. Whilst in reality, I can offer a better service by specialising, is it necessary to learn these other things to a higher level? I don't want to invest money into a grading set up, and I don't even know how possible it'd be to set up a home audio monitoring studio that didn't completely bankrupt me (I'm sure as hell that other people who edit picture and sound don't have proper audio monitoring resources, so i'm not sure how that works).
Again, I know this will be specific to my local market and so on, but I'm curious as to others thoughts and experiences, both specific and more generic.