Home Your Ad Here

Go Back   IndieTalk - Indie Film Forum > Tools of the Trade > Computers/Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2016, 02:18 AM   #1
JulianSieber
Basic Member
 
JulianSieber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 2
Is YouTube killing Filmmaking?

Could YouTube Director Spell the End for Independent Filmmakers?
With only $150 per movie, "YouTube Director" ensures a clear price advantage for the consumer.

But, what does this mean for the filmmaking business? What do you think?
Let me know!

https://blog.filestage.io/youtube-director/
JulianSieber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today   #1A
film guy
Basic Member
 
Posts: 17

 
Old 07-19-2016, 03:02 AM   #2
cheeseandachallenge
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
cheeseandachallenge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 874
No it isn't.
cheeseandachallenge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2016, 10:22 AM   #3
directorik
IndieTalk's Resident Guru
 
directorik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: hollywood
Posts: 9,279
As the author of that blog wrote:

Quote:
So yes, at first YouTube Director may seem like a threat. But, I believe that if you distinguish yourself and take advantage of this new situation, YouTube Director offers more opportunities for filmmakers than it takes away.
That's exactly what I think. Nothing more I can add.

Thanks for bringing this blog to out attention.
directorik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2016, 12:28 PM   #4
FilmmakerJ
Premiere Member
 
FilmmakerJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Garden City, GA
Posts: 330
Even if this offers a new viable option, talent and quality are still going to factor into the mix. And if you, as a business owner are terrible at shooting a compelling advert, and no one they know personally can do it any better, then they're going to need to look elsewhere to get the quality they desire. Either way, they're going to have to pay somebody to get the thing made.
__________________
My latest movie reviews: http://www.thecinemawarehouse.com/ (Follow me on Twitter @FilmmakerJ.)
My portfolio and previous works: http://www.thedreamingstarstudios.com/
My latest short-film project: http://billandmaggiefilm.thedreamingstarstudios.com/
FilmmakerJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2016, 12:35 PM   #5
FilmmakerJ
Premiere Member
 
FilmmakerJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Garden City, GA
Posts: 330
Actually... I just looked at what their third option is.

Seems a big stretch to get someone to go to where-ever your business is for a mere $150 and do all of that stuff though. How would they manage to make that work? $150 isn't enough for travel expenses, and they would have to be good enough at their job to get something done onsite in one day, otherwise then Youtube would have to pay for room and board for a night, which adds up. And $150 ain't gonna cover that.

Maybe the trick is that they hope the business model picks up enough to balance out the different options with their others, so that the more people go for option one or two, option three can cost a lot less because it's other expenses are being covered by one and two. But only if it all works. And it might. In which case, I don't know how well it would work out.

Someone would still have to fill all of these open slots for filmmakers for option 3, and in each state in the country I would assume. Although I don't feel very confident that working FOR Youtube in that way would be a very rewarding job, lol, as you would be answering to Google rather than your own bottom line as an independent videographer, and you might have to sacrifice creativity for something cheap and quick, which would greatly diminish the quality of local advertising and cause a lot of it to become homogenized.

So there would be a lot of strange side-effects and results that could come from this, if it gets going full speed. We will all have to monitor this development and see where it's going.
__________________
My latest movie reviews: http://www.thecinemawarehouse.com/ (Follow me on Twitter @FilmmakerJ.)
My portfolio and previous works: http://www.thedreamingstarstudios.com/
My latest short-film project: http://billandmaggiefilm.thedreamingstarstudios.com/
FilmmakerJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2017, 03:02 AM   #6
Lp8989
Basic Member
 
Lp8989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 5
I gotta agree with directorik, the bigger option 2 gets the more paying jobs in this field I would think. However should the first and third options take off it really only cuts so much, not to mention no computer or software is ever going to create genuine art. After a few thousand are produced the repetition kicks in, just like those "Web Page Wizards" they're all pretty much the same, advert constantly scream for change and new ideas. FilmmakerJ is prolly right on with glitches and such in the work. I have a feeling this is going to fall apart like the wright brother's first design! Of course only time can tell..
Lp8989 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2017, 06:33 AM   #7
FreddyLongSongs
Basic Member
 
FreddyLongSongs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: South Florida
Posts: 212
Can be always work for Alphabet.
FreddyLongSongs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
director, filmmaking, marketing, youtube


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


©IndieTalk