Home
Your Ad Here

Go Back   IndieTalk - Indie Film Forum > Showcase > Screening Room > Other
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-23-2012, 06:53 PM   #1
Phil_UK
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
Phil_UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Amsterdam/London/Worldwide
Posts: 979
FS100 Low Light

Light is everything.. And the FS100 catches it beautifully. Ungraded shots from the Sony FS100 with custom picture profile!

Enjoy

https://vimeo.com/42736004
Phil_UK is offline   Reply With Quote




Old 05-23-2012, 07:15 PM   #2
fernando97echeverria
Basic Member
 
fernando97echeverria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 410
Wow, that was great. Neat lighting, that camera's getting really crisp image.

If you were stateside I'd need to hire you for my feature
But maybe you could just give me some tips on lighting?
fernando97echeverria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 07:49 PM   #3
Phil_UK
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
Phil_UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Amsterdam/London/Worldwide
Posts: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando97echeverria View Post
Wow, that was great. Neat lighting, that camera's getting really crisp image.

If you were stateside I'd need to hire you for my feature
But maybe you could just give me some tips on lighting?
Learn the rules.. (3-point lighting is important. What is a key, fill, back,hair,rim light, kicker)
Once you know them.

Break them

I am by no means an expert or professional, but i just love to light! Its everything!
Phil_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 10:54 PM   #4
knightly
IndieTalk Moderator
 
knightly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 7,672
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to knightly Send a message via Skype™ to knightly
@fernando... put him on an airplane

Nicely done... it's shocking how quickly 1600w of light falls off isn't it?
__________________
YAFI Underground, please like and/or subscribe:
Website - Youtube - Facebook
knightly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 11:41 AM   #5
Phil_UK
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
Phil_UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Amsterdam/London/Worldwide
Posts: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by knightly View Post
@fernando... put him on an airplane

Nicely done... it's shocking how quickly 1600w of light falls off isn't it?

Yeah. For 1600w, that is indeed quite quick
Phil_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 11:55 AM   #6
Ewan
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 329
Wow, it worked really well. The shadows were really good.
Ewan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 07:07 AM   #7
Phil_UK
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
Phil_UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Amsterdam/London/Worldwide
Posts: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ewan View Post
Wow, it worked really well. The shadows were really good.
Thank you!
Phil_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 01:03 PM   #8
navmachine
Basic Member
 
navmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 58
Nice test work. The footage looks nice and clean. How far does the camera stop down too?
navmachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 04:36 PM   #9
USNFilms
Basic Member
 
USNFilms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 252
very well done, the footage looks really Nice and I like what you can do with the FS100. I also liked the lens flare caused by the flashlight beam.
USNFilms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 05:09 PM   #10
gebo
Basic Member
 
gebo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: PT
Posts: 300
This looks great. I want this camera... or maybe a canon c300...
hmm can't afford a t2i better forget it...

thanks for sharing
gebo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 05:12 PM   #11
Phil_UK
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
Phil_UK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Amsterdam/London/Worldwide
Posts: 979
Want me to shoot a similar test comparing FS100 to Canon T2i?
Phil_UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 06:22 PM   #12
WalterB
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rotterdam Area, The Netherlands
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by knightly View Post
Nicely done... it's shocking how quickly 1600w of light falls off isn't it?
It sure is, but fall off has, physically speaking, nothing to do with Watts, but with distance between source, subject and backgound

(Twice the distance = loosing 75% of the light.
My Math-English isn't really good but there is an inverted square relation between distance and fall off.
If the source-subject distance (=Ds) is 1 meter and source-backgroud (Dbg) is 4 meter, the background gets 1/(4^2) (that's 1/16th) of the amount of light the subjects gets.
With Ds=2 and Dbg=4 the subject still gets 1/(2^2) (=1/4th of the light).
With a Ds closer to Dbg (like 10 vs 12) the fall off between subject and background is much less. (But you'll need far more power to begin with, because the most of the fall off happens before the light hit the subject in this case.)

BTW, it looks really good.
Fall off doesn't bother me at all.

(When you compare it with a rebel or C300: show some rolling shutter stuff as well )
WalterB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 07:21 PM   #13
Jeff Troiano
Basic - Premiere Expired
 
Jeff Troiano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil_UK View Post
Want me to shoot a similar test comparing FS100 to Canon T2i?

I'd love to see that, considering I have both the fs100 and 60D. I love both cameras. My 60D is mainly for stills and HDR.
Jeff Troiano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 07:52 PM   #14
knightly
IndieTalk Moderator
 
knightly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 7,672
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via AIM to knightly Send a message via Skype™ to knightly
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterB View Post
It sure is, but fall off has, physically speaking, nothing to do with Watts, but with distance between source, subject and backgound
You are correct. I am very familiar with the inverse square law... on our last set, I used a 2K Mole-Richardson as fill for a scene on an indie shoot. It was the strongest light we had and some of the folks on the set were confused why I wasn't using that as key and filling with other fixtures that were closer to the subjects.

I LOVE the inverse square law, I live it, I used as my dimmer for many years... the physics of light fascinate me.

I was just saying it for the sake of the folks who are often forced to use 3x100 bare bulbs in clamp lights due to budgetary constraints... to compare their reality (which I lived for a long time) to a "Low Light" post from a professional. I still don't own (or have much access to) lights that big... my whole kit is 500w open face lights and lower.

Twice the distance, quarter the light! I chant this to myself as I go to sleep, drives my wife crazy!
__________________
YAFI Underground, please like and/or subscribe:
Website - Youtube - Facebook
knightly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2012, 03:14 AM   #15
brianluce
Basic Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 1,501
were you at 1.4?
brianluce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

©2003-2013 IndieTalk