 |
04-25-2012, 10:18 AM
|
#2
|
|
Basic - Premiere Expired
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,545
|
Last edited by PaulGriffith; 04-25-2012 at 10:24 AM.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 10:25 AM
|
#3
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: About a thousand years from now
Posts: 4,713
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGriffith
Most of wheargrinder's stuff, brianluce's upcoming work and a chunk of of Kholi's stuff is all GH2, I think it warrants a thread.
|
Great!
Can I get a second on a "Shot by a GH2" thread nomination?!
Last edited by rayw; 04-25-2012 at 10:33 AM.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 12:05 PM
|
#5
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 609
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayw
Great!
Can I get a second on a "Shot by a GH2" thread nomination?!
|
I'll second it. Can we include the GH1, too?
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 12:16 PM
|
#6
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: About a thousand years from now
Posts: 4,713
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cameronchapman
I'll second it. Can we include the GH1, too?
|
Yes, ma'am. Deal.
http://www.indietalk.com/showthread.php?p=263143
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 02:31 PM
|
#8
|
|
Basic - Premiere Expired
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,176
|
Great idea, RAY!
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 04:52 PM
|
#9
|
|
Basic - Premiere Expired
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,073
|
Cool resource, ray
One small correction, Stockholm Santa was shot on the 7D. Only the one-scene re-shoot was shot on the T3i.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 05:04 PM
|
#10
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: About a thousand years from now
Posts: 4,713
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadylocks
Cool resource, ray
One small correction, Stockholm Santa was shot on the 7D. Only the one-scene re-shoot was shot on the T3i.
|
Thank you, miss D.
Correction made.
Yeah, my dual intention is both A) for users of the same models (and it looks like the pretty much the whole EOS series) to be able to relatively rapidly compare what they're doing to what their "base equipment peers" are doing to exchange techniques through explicit inquiry or passive reverse engineering, and B) for EOS and GH1/2 users to compare and contrast subtle differences between what a Canon APS-C sensor and a Panasonic micro four thirds sensor (M43) is able to output.
Even with my untrained DSLR nubie eye I can see some differences the lenses themselves make.
I hope you guys get to pick up a thing or two from each other. GL!
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 06:07 PM
|
#11
|
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,837
|
This is all shot on T2i:
http://vimeo.com/user4704924/videos
Then, there's the subway scene from this movie, shot on the 7D (which is basically identical to the T2i, for filmmaking purposes).
Why do I point this out? The more footage I see, the more I've come to realize that lighting is really all that matters, and you can use pretty much any camera you want.
Give me an Arri Alexa, and my footage is still gonna look like crap (or at least not up to Hollywood standards). Give Matthew Libatique (DP for Black Swan) a 7D, and almost nobody will be able to differentiate between his 7D footage and anything else they see. That's because Matthew Libatique is a skilled DP who knows how to light, and I am not.
That's not to say that it isn't worth your time to compare cameras. There are many reasons why you might want one over another. I only mean to say that when people compare and discuss footage, I personally think that their lighting techniques should take the forefront of the conversation, and the camera not so much.
I hope I'm not being a party-pooper. I do think these two threads were a great idea, Ray.
__________________
GUERILLA!!!
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 06:22 PM
|
#12
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: About a thousand years from now
Posts: 4,713
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cracker Funk
I hope I'm not being a party-pooper.
|
No, sir.
Sincerely, I don't take legit discussion of the elements that go into a filmmaking as being any shade of negative.
Your point about the importance of lighting and the value that it brings to an image is EXACTLY part of what I wanted to root out of the woods, so to speak.
Watching a random short here and there, and vaguely paying a mote of attention as to the rudimentary conditions under which it may have been acquired is not really conducive to any sensible analytical take away.
By lining them up in a big ol' string anyone can go down the list, make their own observations, such as your own, provide observations and (hopefully) engage in a mature conversation that I and many have come to expect from the... frankly... delightful community workshop atmosphere IndieTalk.com provides to nascent filmmakers.
But I thought it most appropriate to begin with the central piece of hardware that we all pretty much define on which side of the lens a problem or effect occurs.
The camera is the pivot point.
The fulcrum.
It is only a tool I'll concede until the cows come home, but a critical tool at the heart of filmmaking.
Quote:
I do think these two threads were a great idea, Ray.
|
Thank you, as well.
Last edited by rayw; 04-25-2012 at 06:38 PM.
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 07:07 PM
|
#13
|
|
Basic - Premiere Expired
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: France - North Africa
Posts: 667
|
I think that first post needs a lot of cleaning.
I thought the point was to show quality stuff.
I personally love this channel on Vimeo (T2i then GH2)
https://vimeo.com/davidhjlindberg/videos
|
|
|
04-25-2012, 07:13 PM
|
#14
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: About a thousand years from now
Posts: 4,713
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheArtist
I think that first post needs a lot of cleaning.
I thought the point was to show quality stuff.
|
No sir.
It's to see how far the medium can be pushed and to overcome our perceptual rather than technological limitations.
What I can do with a kitchen knife and what Steven Seagal can do with a kitchen knife ain't even the same.
Why?
How?
Answering these sort of questions is the point of this thread.
Not really to critique anyone's anything.
And BTW, nice find and contribution with David Linberg's material.
Very nice.
Last edited by rayw; 04-25-2012 at 08:29 PM.
|
|
|
04-27-2012, 10:39 AM
|
#15
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 135
|
Do you think my Canon T2I footage is up to par with the others? I am terrible at judging my own footage/art.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.
©2003-2013 IndieTalk
|
|
 |