Quote:
Originally Posted by cstegner
I have no official affiliation with the board so I'm totally allowed to call BS.
You opened an account just to post a glowing review of a movie that from it's trailer looks less then glowing. I know I'm new around here, but wasn't born yesterday
All the same good luck with the movie.
|
I wouldn't say the movie isn't glowing. It actually looks pretty fun--it's no Schindler's List, but I can see a definite target audience.
It looks well filmed, the performances are appropriate and campy, and it's got a lot of good looking half nude women in it...I'd say it probably will do pretty well for itself.
Not everyone can shoot a film on Red with adapters and lenses. Not everyone chooses to make a remake of a classic horror theme.
I'm just being the Devil's advocate here...kudos to a quality looking indie film that sports a lot of material perfect for a specific target audience. It looks like a lot of fun, and it probably was a lot of fun to work on.
I remember the Porky's series, and I loved them as a kid. I'd hate to think that internet pron has completely jaded this target audience. I also very much liked the Nat Lam series--not that this is on par with those films, but it certainly has a similar flavor. Nat Lam was the thinking man's mature movie...Porky's was the...non-thinking man's?

Either way, they can be fun. Some times people want a story behind their boobs.
But yes, I would call BS on the promo meter as well...reviewers don't start accounts to promote their review of a film...