 |
04-09-2012, 08:35 AM
|
#1
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 110
|
Letterboxing
I am torn on having a letter box or cutting the video. I mean the letter box will render your video about wider but I'm thinking of making a video with the project settings of 1280x574, would that be the same of the letter boxed 1280x720, all other things being equal?
|
|
|
04-09-2012, 11:08 AM
|
#2
|
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio USA
Posts: 3,180
|
Letterboxing is when you have a cropped image with the actual black bars on the top and bottom.
1280x720 is 16x9 or 1.77 to 1 aspect ratio.
If you cropped the image further to 1280x574, you are creating a 2.23 to 1 aspect ratio. If displayed on a 16x9 TV, it would be letterboxed. This is similar to the 2.35 to 1 of 'scope' movies theatrically.
The question is really an artistic one. Do you need the rectangular image to be a wider aspect ratio? How does that serve the story you are telling?
|
|
|
04-11-2012, 10:57 AM
|
#3
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by butterbescotch
I am torn on having a letter box or cutting the video. I mean the letter box will render your video about wider but I'm thinking of making a video with the project settings of 1280x574, would that be the same of the letter boxed 1280x720, all other things being equal?
|
Just wanted to add to this...
cropping or letterboxing to 1280x574 would give you a 2.2:1 aspect ratio, this inst used anywhere as a standard most features would use a 2.35:1 or 2.40:1 aspect ratio for an artistic 'scope' look or TV would just leave it the way it is (16:9 = 1280x720). To get either of these using 720p footage (1280x720) you would need to crop or letterbox to:
1280x545 = 2.35:1 (I usually use this one)
1280x533 = 2.40:1
|
|
|
04-12-2012, 11:27 AM
|
#4
|
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio USA
Posts: 3,180
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jooble
cropping or letterboxing to 1280x574 would give you a 2.2:1 aspect ratio
|
Well.... that's isn't a 100% true. There is a rare, but official use of 2.2 to 1 aspect ratio called Super Panavision
Super Panavision 70 was a 70mm version of the Panavision process meant to compete directly with the 70mm Todd-AO process. Super Panavision 70 has also been known as Panavision 70, Super Panavision, Panavision, and Panavision Super 70. With an anamorphic lens, SP70 movies could have a final aspect ratio of 2.76:1. Famous movies that were filmed in Super Panavision 70 are My Fair Lady, 2001: A Space Odyssey, and Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.
|
|
|
04-12-2012, 12:20 PM
|
#5
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 86
|
Fair play, didnt know 2.2:1 was used for anything. I imagine its fairly rare these days but thats ANOTHER! aspect ratio to add to the long list lol.
|
|
|
04-12-2012, 03:19 PM
|
#6
|
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio USA
Posts: 3,180
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jooble
Fair play, didnt know 2.2:1 was used for anything. I imagine its fairly rare these days but thats ANOTHER! aspect ratio to add to the long list lol.
|
It's practically nonexistent today, but check out
http://www.widescreen.org/aspect_ratios.shtml
|
|
|
04-12-2012, 10:54 AM
|
#7
|
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,511
|
I use this page
http://www.digitalrebellion.com/weba...pect_calc.html
you set the "calculate" field to height
set the "present" to 720 HDTV
and chose your aspect to calculate the height..
__________________
You may think me a little mad, but you'd be wrong, there is nothing little about my madness.
|
|
|
04-16-2012, 12:27 AM
|
#8
|
|
Premiere Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,511
|
All this data leaves me without an understanding of WHAT I should do. I like the widescreen look, even on my little internet videos. So whats the RIGHT aspect to chose?
__________________
You may think me a little mad, but you'd be wrong, there is nothing little about my madness.
|
|
|
04-17-2012, 04:52 AM
|
#9
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 110
|
@Everyone
Thanks for the informative replies.
@wheatgrinder
There's really no right or wrong aspect. Mostly it's just a universal standard. As long as the aspect correlates on your composition, I guess you'd be fine.
|
|
|
04-17-2012, 07:32 AM
|
#10
|
|
Basic Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 86
|
Aspect ratios are usually down to two things...
1. artistic preference
2. re framing in post (pan scan)
But yea its up to you, most common one I see and use 2.35 for films.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.
©2003-2013 IndieTalk
|
|
 |