Search results

i agree with what he said somewhat. people need to look back and relize that filmmaking is nothing more than storytelling except visually. espically with the chapter on CG I 100% agree that some movies the graphics take away from the story and it becomes more about showboating the technology

defintly, would someone please murder reality tv

i would like to view this short if you have it on the web

inexpensive? if you are talking about transfering digital to film you should just shot on like 70mm the transfer of digital to film is so expensive you should just start off with film defintly much less expensive

Selling it on your website as in selling copies? but you still own all the rights to it correct? Festivals are a great oppertunity to possibly get your movie bought, or perhaps bring it to another level. There is also a big to-do when it comes to licenses pertaining to music. Sometimes you can...

this is a great learning community, however keep in mind that you have a very good idea out there. The entertainment industry is pure evil and if you are serious about selling it just be careful of who knows your plan. On a better note, I think the idea is wonderful. Bumfights is sad to watch...

As far as lighting is concerned I swear by Harry Box's set lighting tech. handbook 3rd edition

I have used flash in the past to do a whole scene rotoscoped but im not sure how it might work when you try to use it with layering it over video. just a thought

digital may be the future but it is defintly still far away. the technology is getting good but its still not nearly as good as film. Film seems expensive to a small budget but the industry(hollywood) film is the cheapest thing on set.

my bad sometimes coffee just gets to me in the evening

not meaning to argue but i was being slightly sarcastic with the bolex comment. Bolex although a great camera is out of its league when it comes to the cameras of today. you have to rember that camera is ww2 era. lets now take to acutally comparable cameras. shoot them both with the same lens...

i dont really see this being possible for a number of reasons. with all film cameras you really shouldnt be able to tell the difference from arri to panavision to bolex. reason for this is basically a film camera has no real control over what the image looks like, all it does is take un exposed...

picks up better than your 3 chip camera that seems to make no sense. ccds are light sensitive devices. a 3 ccd camera would most defintly be better in low light than a 1 chip camera.