StevenUK
04-07-2005, 05:23 AM
Hello,
whilst my '35mm master peice' is still very much in pre-production, I have written and a short film which I am using as a learning curve.
I intend to shoot this cheaply as it only needs to be up to broadcast quality for DVD. I have free access to a Canon XM1 MiniDV Camcorder. Does anyone know of any flaws or problems with this camera?
I've completed some test footage which seems OK. However I could stretch to hiring a more professional camera if it's worth it?
Thanks for any advice.
Steven
Demosthenes X
04-07-2005, 11:03 PM
If it's a learning experiance, the XM1 should do the job admirably. I can't say I know much about it, but it seems to be a younger brother of the XL1? For a "cheapie" short, it should be more than capable. I would be inclined to save my money for the more expensive feature!
StevenUK
04-13-2005, 07:29 AM
Thanks for the response Demosthene X.
Demosthenes X
04-14-2005, 08:12 PM
No prob. In fact, I recently discovered that the XM1 is the same camera as the GL1 over here. The reviews of the GL2 I've seen have been great, so I think the XM1 should be an awesome cam for you.
Best of luck, and all that.
cibao
04-14-2005, 10:08 PM
No prob. In fact, I recently discovered that the XM1 is the same camera as the GL1 over here. The reviews of the GL2 I've seen have been great, so I think the XM1 should be an awesome cam for you.
Best of luck, and all that.
I have the GL 2. I've had no problems with it and shot a feature with it with no gliches. And I haven't even learned a quarter of what it can do.
Chris
StevenUK
05-06-2005, 04:12 AM
Just thought I'd post my progress with the Canon XM1.
After doing some test footage I have been very impressed with such a 'cheap' camera.
The quality is good (especially as I am going to 'rough it up' in FCP).
Pretty good manual controls, I didn't realise how random the automatic ones could be until I experimented between the two. I'll have to put a bit more care into planning my shots, but that's the main thing I wanted to experience with this project. I'll definately be having some fun with depth of field.
16:9 capabilty and I also I like the 'frames' option, a nice little cheat to give a filmic feel (not its real function).
Cheers to everyone for their comments.
Steven
clive
05-06-2005, 06:05 AM
16:9 capabilty
It's not anamorphic so you can't actually shoot wide screen on it.
StevenUK
05-06-2005, 07:46 AM
Thanks for the 'heads up' Clive.
that could have been a costly mistake. I hadn't really tested that feature yet.
Steven