Well thanks for the reply directorik. But when i said experienced Director/Producer i mean the working experience not that much experienced that they can have the relationship or hi hello with any distributor.
In that case we go all the way back to the challenge that all independent filmmakers face.
You have an excellent script.
You have a producer who is experienced but has never had a movie
released and make a profit.
You have a director who is experienced but has never had a movie
released and make a profit.
You don’t have a budget for name actors.
This is a very risky investment.
Of course we can all name a dozen films made and released that
fall under all three criteria. Most of those were self financed -
meaning they didn’t attract “investors” but were financed by the
filmmakers and their friends.
But according to my teacher if you want the charachter to be superior then you should come up with unknow face.
I agree with Chris. In a purely artistic sense this may be
correct. But in the business of motion picture production and
distribution it is terribly naive. "Superman" did well with the
unknown Christopher Reeve. "Superman Returns" did poorly
with the unknown Brandon Routh. It's difficult for me to say
that "The Dark Knight" would have been superior with an
unknown face as Batman.
Wouldn’t it be nice if people paid to see films based on how well
the written character was portrayed?
Since you are asking about investors I assume you mean business
people looking for a project that will make money for them. Am I
correct?
Or are you asking about people you know, who believe in you and
your project?